War of words over Nukes - bigger may not be better
Who and what survives in a nuclear showdown will be a question of who has how many and how big a country you are
In the ensuing “mine-is-bigger-than-yours” duel between
Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un the question to ask should not be who has bigger
missiles, or a switch to launch them for that matter, but who has how many
nukes.
What perhaps the world should be looking at is whether North
Korea does really have enough nukes at its disposal to carry out its threats,
and if so, how powerful are these missiles to reach the target countries.
According to some reports, recent North Korean tests and
launches do show the country either already has, or has displayed enough
capability to arm its Hwasong-15 missiles with “super heavy warheads” that can
strike the US mainland – given the time and airspace to let it do so.
A test missile launched by North Korea on November 29 last year flew nearly 3000 miles at a vertical trajectory in 53 minutes. According to some experts, this means the missile would have a range of over 8100 miles on a standard trajectory. So theoretically speaking, the ICBM does have the capacity to traverse the roughly 6800 miles (11,000 kms) from Pyongyang to Washington DC, a distance which a commercial airliner would take a little over 13 hours to cover, in just a matter of two hours.
However, two hours is a lifetime in nuke-speak. And added to
that the Hwasong-15, like its previous generation missile, Hwasong-14 is a
massive projectile that makes for an easy target in the sky notwithstanding its
speed. This means the US BMD system has enough time and enough of a target to
aim at in the roughly 120 minutes that it will take the missile to reach the
Eastern shores of the country.
But again, it is not so simple. The situation could be quite
different based on where and how many missiles are targeted by Kim Jong at the
US. Military experts point out having a nation-wide BMD system is an
impossibility both physically and financially.
Therefore, nations plan their
BMDs for strategic locations choosing only the most critical and indispensable
installations for protection safeguarding against total annihilation and
ensuring retaliation against the enemy.
While it is physically not impossible to spread a blanket of
missile defence systems across the country, it is also not feasible to stop all
the missiles dropping in from the skies. For instance, on March 6, 2017 North
Korea simultaneously fired four Hwasong-7 extended range scuds practically
displaying its capability to launch multiple attacks within seconds of each
other.
If this is so, the question then boils down to how many
nukes does Kim Jong actually have? Are there enough of them to target both the
US, Japan and South Korea apart from sundry other countries before North Korea
itself is annihilated in retaliatory fire. If statics are anything to go by,
the numbers are clearly stacked against Kim Jong and in fact he may not have
enough warheads to arm the rockets he has been shooting off into the sky.
According to the latest data from the Federation of American
Scientists (FAS), which tracks nuke arsenals across the world, North Korea was
estimated to have a stockpile of just between 10 and 20 nukes as of end of
2017. Compared to this the US has a confirmed stockpile of 4000 warheads apart
from approximately 2,600 retired warheads that are yet to be dismantled. So,
clearly the numbers are not o Kim’s side.
Nobody knows this better than Kim
Jong himself. Not surprisingly, there is a clear method to his madness and the
relatively young dictator has been moving his pieces smartly so that he can
have his cake and eat it too. He knows very well he cannot go beyond sabre
rattling and has made just enough noise to tell the world that he is not a push
over while making overtures towards the South Koreans to open the gates for
reconciliation.
One need not feel surprised if sometime in the near future
Kim manages to wrangle some concessions from the West while he also gets to
keep his nukes.
Post a Comment