Indian Media Ownership - Waiting for Bezos!
Part II
Is something like the takeover of the WaPo by Amazon boss Jeff Bezos the solution to the extreme polarization in Indian media? Maybe, but the question is who among the Indian tech tzars is willing to dish out the moolah and let go? Or are the new generation "platishers" the answer for a polzrized Indian media?
A casual conversation
with a senior colleague at the office set my thoughts rolling on this. Why is
the Indian media so polarized? And what is the solution for it?
While the why was
perhaps addressed in the previous part of this post, the how of it is best
answered by looking at what is happening in the rest of the world today, particularly
the USA.
Very interestingly it
is the tech honchos who seem to be eager to fix a broken media with the debate
around fake news and a polarized mainline media gaining ground in the wake of
the election of Donald Trump to the US Presidency. Several of them have come
forth with their own solutions hoping to provide an alternative to traditional
media and often with broad-based participation. And as is their wont, many are
also looking for salvation in these solutions for their businesses hoping new
models for reader oriented news and content will turnaround their businesses.
Prominent among these
is billionaire CEO Ev Williams, the
co-founder of Twitter, and founder of long-from blogging platform Medium.
Williams has already spent five years and raised $134 million for the project
valuing it at $600. He re-launched in March this year with a new business
model and pitch. “MEDIA IS BROKEN, IT NEEDS FIXING”, he said making it a
members-only platform for premium articles.
Putting out a justification of Williams’ plan,
M.G. Siegler a former journalist, VC
and investor in Medium, said: “The obsessive political coverage. Questions of
curation and bias. The rise of fake news. Things are simply not heading in the
right direction. And the problems seem to be accelerating.” Going by online
analytics Medium is a success. Two billion words written in the last year, 7.5
million posts during that time and, 60 million monthly readers, shared Siegler.
(since then the number has gone up to 85 million monthly readers and
interestingly India accounting for the highest traffic after the US, though the
gap between the two is quite vast.)
And such concerns are
driving others too on this path. The latest entrant into this game is Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, who
created a buzz announcing the intent to launch Wikitribune, a news platform to
bring journalists and a community of volunteers together. “THE NEWS IS BROKEN
AND WE CAN FIX IT”, he said as if in response to Williams pitch, announcing the
re-launch of Medium.
But Medium and
Wikitribune are poles apart in their approach to the solution. The former is a
writer-oriented platform for opinion and personal blogging with paid access to
some of the content, whereas Wikitribune will be a kind of a crowd-sourced
platform for what Wales says is “evidence-based” news. “We’re bringing genuine
community control to our news with unrestricted access for all. We’re
developing a living, breathing tool that’ll present accurate information with
real evidence, so that you can confidently make up your own mind,” Wales said.
There are at least a
score other commonly used platforms for long-form blogging and writing
beginning with Atavist, longreads.com, Shorthand and Storyform to name
just a few. While many of these “platishers”
promise an alternative to traditional print journalism and provide genuine
reading to readers, what is interesting is that several leading print
publications themselves use these platforms to enhance their own online
presence which perhaps is an endorsement of the potential for this very new
model of journalism.
But all said and done,
the moot question still remains. Can they fix the broken media? And how will
this change journalism and print, which still constitutes the core of the
media, catering to owners’ interests at the cost of objectivity and reader
interest? This is a concern as much for India as it is for America.
Some hope and perhaps
a model to address this issue however is available from the 2013 acquisition or
bailout, if you may, of the Washington Post by another tech billionaire Jeff Bezos. Forking out $250 million in
upfront cash for the acquisition, the Amazon founder and CEO told employees, he
would not be involved in the running of the newspaper and would not interfere
with the journalistic process. “The values of The Post do not need changing.
The paper’s duty will remain to its readers and not to the private interests of
its owners,” he assured journalists and other employees at the first
face-to-face. One change which he did of course promise was to bring the
organization up to speed where technology was concerned and that is exactly
what has happened over the past four years at The Post.
Clearly, an approach
like this is what the media everywhere needs. An owner who swears by editorial
values and seeks to uphold reader interests though not necessarily at the cost
of the bottom-line. So, the question is will a Jeff Bezos emerge on the Indian
media scene? For instance will a NR
Narayana Murthy or an Azim Premji
fork out the needed moolah to either set up a new publication or for that matter
acquire an existing one.
No doubt some of them,
mostly former senior tech executives, who are now involved in non-tech areas,
have funded a few online properties but mostly dealing with niche content and
by no means big enough to make an impact on the national media scene.
Conservatively speaking
it could cost anywhere between Rs 100 crore and Rs150 crore to launch a news
channel, depending on its scale. A full-fledged national daily with four metro
editions would need close to Rs 300 crore. It is uncertain which Indian tech tsar
would want to fork out that kind of money, particularly given the uncertain
payback.
Thus it is a long shot
to expect anybody from the Indian tech sector, either current or the past, to
be coming forth to fund a full-fledged media venture as purely a journalistic
endeavor. The alternative of an overseas investor like a Bezos, too going the
whole hog and pumping in money, is a far cry given the FDI rules in India.
Clearly it could be a long wait for either the online platishers, or somebody like a Bezos, to come and rescue Indian journalism.
Post a Comment